|
|||||||
Back to the Research Activities | |||||||
The Office Space Allocation Problem - Overview | |||||||
|
Description The class of Space Allocation or Capacity Allocation problems are those in which the amount of space (area or volume) or capacity that is available has to be distributed among a set of items, satisfying specific requirements and constraints. Examples of this class of problems are: bin packing problem, knapsack problem, space planning and others. Here, Office Space Allocation refers to the distribution of the available areas of office space among a number of entities with different sizes so as to ensure the optimal space utilisation and the satisfaction of additional requirements and/or constraints. In this generic case, an important condition exists: the areas of space that can be used and the space required by the entities are not subject to modification. Then the quality of a solution or allocation is measured in terms of the following five aspects (not necessarily in this order of importance):
The ideal solution in the space allocation problem is one where all the entities are allocated, no space is wasted or overused and every additional requirements and constraints have been satisfied. However, not always this ideal optimal solution is achievable. In a more realistic scenario, the optimal solution would be one where all objects are scheduled and the space utilisation is the best possible, i.e. the amount of space wasted and overused has been reduced to the minimum and the additional requirements and constraints have been all satisfied. Some examples of constraints (specific restrictions hat should or must be fulfilled) are listed below, but different constraints may exist in different scenarios. Constraints can be classified as hard or soft. Hard constraints are those that cannot be violated while soft constraints are those that can be broken but penalised. To minimise the penalties in a solution for an Office Space Allocation problem, no hard constraints should be violated and as many as possible soft constraints should be satisfied.
Most of the real instances of the Office Space Allocation problem can be classified as one of the following types: Reorganisation of the existing allocation. Refers to the rearrangement of the current space distribution among the entities and it is performed when either it is required to improve the existing solution under the existing conditions or it is required to modify the allocation because the conditions (requirements, constraints, number of entities to be allocated, number of areas of space) of the problem change. Construction of a complete solution. The construction of a complete allocation or solution refers to the generation of a new solution from scratch to distribute all the available areas of space among all the entities in the problem under the given conditions. When reorganising an existing allocation, it may be required to minimise the amount of disruption caused, i.e. relocation of entities. This constraint exists because it may be too costly to move every entity around and this often impedes finding the optimal utilisation of space. When reorganising an allocation, the amount of disruption permitted establishes a balance between the quality of the allocation and the difficulty in achieving it. Office Space Allocation in Academic Institutions In the context of higher educational institutions, this problem is defined as the allocation of entities (staff, students, meeting rooms, lecture rooms, special rooms, etc.) to areas of space such as rooms, satisfying as many requirements and constrains as possible. This problem is highly constrained, has multiple objectives, varies greatly among different institutions, requires frequent modifications due to the addition or remove of entities and/or rooms and has a direct impact on the functionality of the university. Allocating rooms in universities is a multi-stage process:
During these three phases, the problem can be solved in different ways at each stage:
Related Information
|
|||||||
| Last Update: 28 July 2006 | |||||||